ChaimAharon says:
October 6, 2014 12:49 pm 12:49 pm at 12:49 pm
According to the psak, he is the Bobov-45 Rebbe rather than what you wrote (Bobov Rebbe 45.
RepublicanDemocrat says:
October 6, 2014 2:22 pm 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm
As per the recent ruling of the deciding beis din between the two sides of the split in bobov, it must be written the “bobov 45 rebbe” and not the “bobover rebbe 45” the psak din clearly states this detail.
kollel faker says:
October 6, 2014 4:14 pm 4:14 pm at 4:14 pm
Who really cares
sifsei chachamim says:
October 6, 2014 4:42 pm 4:42 pm at 4:42 pm
i dont recall the YWN is obligated to follow this din torah.
avreimi says:
October 6, 2014 5:41 pm 5:41 pm at 5:41 pm
1 and 2: YWN was not a party to the Din Torah. A Beis Din psak is not binding upon anyone other than the parties tonthe Din Torah and YWN can therefore refer to the either of the Bobover Rebbes however it wishes.
avreimi says:
October 6, 2014 5:42 pm 5:42 pm at 5:42 pm
1 and 2: YWN was not a party to the Din Torah. A Beis Din psak is not binding upon anyone other than the parties to the Din Torah and YWN can therefore refer to either of the Bobover Rebbes however it wishes.
velicher choosid says:
October 8, 2014 8:37 am 8:37 am at 8:37 am
Allo, Bobov 45 isn’t accepting the psak, why should ywn. Bobov’s strength never was fighting and hooliganism so ywn has nothing to worry about.
Moderators Response: “Bobov’s strength never was fighting and hooliganism”….Besides when YWN was punched in the face in the 48th Street Sukkah…..no hooliganism….. simply animalistic.
7 Responses
According to the psak, he is the Bobov-45 Rebbe rather than what you wrote (Bobov Rebbe 45.
As per the recent ruling of the deciding beis din between the two sides of the split in bobov, it must be written the “bobov 45 rebbe” and not the “bobover rebbe 45” the psak din clearly states this detail.
Who really cares
i dont recall the YWN is obligated to follow this din torah.
1 and 2: YWN was not a party to the Din Torah. A Beis Din psak is not binding upon anyone other than the parties tonthe Din Torah and YWN can therefore refer to the either of the Bobover Rebbes however it wishes.
1 and 2: YWN was not a party to the Din Torah. A Beis Din psak is not binding upon anyone other than the parties to the Din Torah and YWN can therefore refer to either of the Bobover Rebbes however it wishes.
Allo, Bobov 45 isn’t accepting the psak, why should ywn. Bobov’s strength never was fighting and hooliganism so ywn has nothing to worry about.
Moderators Response: “Bobov’s strength never was fighting and hooliganism”….Besides when YWN was punched in the face in the 48th Street Sukkah…..no hooliganism….. simply animalistic.