I don’t check back here so often any more, but this thread has been disturbing me. The vast amounts of Halachic misinformation is scary.
anonymouschochom: Wrong. The age at which a girl’s uncovered skin is considered an “Ervah” by D’varim Shebikdushah has absolutely nothing to do with an “Ervah” as in the singular form of “Arayos”, which is what is relevant to the touching discussion.
RavHamachshir: The Tzitz Eliezer in 6:39 Perek 22 or 23 discusses that precise case, if I recall correctly.