Home › Forums › Humor & Entertainment › Amusing Biblical Hermeneutics › Reply To: Amusing Biblical Hermeneutics
January 8, 2012 10:07 pm at 10:07 pm
#861013
dash
Participant
A zonah is not a paramour. That would probably be closer to the definition of pilegesh.
No a Pilegesh is a comcubine and a Noef is a paramour. I’m not sure what a Zonah is. (Although in the broadest definition Zonah could mean paramour.)
