I was thinking about that, and truth is I don’t know 87 well enough yet. But let it be an issur hana’ah; since it is pogem the ta’aruvos you aren’t having hana’ah! (which is the Ran’s justification for the heter of ?”? ???? in the first place)
I was thinking about that, and truth is I don’t know 87 well enough yet. But let it be an issur hana’ah; since it is pogem the ta’aruvos you aren’t having hana’ah! (which is the Ran’s justification for the heter of ?”? ???? in the first place)