moi aussi -“MiddlePath, your post could not have been written better. I’m surprised the mods allowed it, because it’s pointing the finger at them.
Smartcookie, you make a lot of sense when you say: “Btw, I was looking through AYC’s post where he writes I’m a kletzky. Looks to me like he meant to say- I am like the Kletzkys, I also had a family tragedy this summer.”
After reading the other posts/topics about this – I have to disagree. It is quite possible that he meant this and it’s quite possible he meant to manipulate. If he would e-mail the mods explaining his posting error -I’d think at that point we would have to be Dan L’caf Zecus. Right now we aren’t required to. The safety of the individual posters are more important.
“I’m wondering if the name Kletzky is the problem? If someone claimed to belong to the Twerski family would he/she also become a stalking suspect?
Smartcookie, I also agree that mods are not above making poor judgments. I will go even further by saying that mods are not above suspicion. NOBODY should be trusted, chabdehu vechashdehu applies to mods as well.
However, I will never understand what harm was done by AYC when he/she said “I am a Kletzky”. As I said earlier, if it’s true, what harm was done? If it’s a lie, who cares?”
If none of his post is true -it clearly points to stalker. I’m not in the security field, but it seems quite simple. The whole purpose of the lie was to continue the manipulation. Con men operate by gaining other’s trust. I don’t know if he is one, but the burden of proof is on him right now to prove he isn’t one.