ZSK:
My advice in my previous posts remains.
No, there is zero Torah authority that claims the three oaths are not in force. Zero.
Regarding: “Your insistence that Jews lived in “peace” before the “Zionist invasion” is a textbook Cherry-Picking Fallacy. You’ve conveniently scrubbed the 1834 Safed plunder, the 1517 Hebron attacks, and some 1300 years of humiliating Dhimmi status from your memory. ”
No, it is reality. You’ve listed three incidents from the hundreds of years prior the Zionist invasion, implying that the Zionists’ invasion did not severely reduce the peace the Jews enjoyed there. SMH.
And the “rise of Pan-Arabism” would have been irrelevant to Jews had the Zionists not invaded.
And it is not I that have no shame but you that refuse to see reality. The Chevron Massacre occurred because of Zionism. Period. No, obviously a “cordial” relationship will not prevent savages from rioting when godless Zionists proclaim that the Kosel is theirs (while under British administration) and the savages believed that their Al Aqsa mosque was under threat thanks to those godless Zionists (and Rabbi Kook backing them up, claiming to the Mufti that he cannot distinguish between religious feelings and nationalist feelings, as it happens).
And Zionism is indeed the opposite of Judaism. You can read the current dear leader’s mentor’s words on that, stating that the New Hebrew will be the opposite of a Jew. Looking at it “on the ground”, Jews are Baishanim Rachmanim and gomlei chasadim. The news stories each day reveals the depths of the opposite that are the Zionists, as in their horrific assaults against (chareidi) Jews there.
Again, my advice in my prior post remains.