none2.0,
“You have no idea how liberal your way of thinking sounds. Let’s use for example liberal speak. They use the words “red herring” they say there’s a “specific way” to interpret certain things that if someone is doing XYZ even if it makes perfect sense they are just using a straw man…..you don’t see the pattern your using”
This whole section makes no sense. What are you trying to say? Just a bunch or random stuff you think will bother me?
“What about reading the plain text and understanding it in context.”
That’s the very first step of learning. And based on your prior posts, you’re not capable of it.
“I’m ok with everyone’s interactions but I have my own too.”
You mean interpretations, and no, you are obviously not ok with everyone’s. Otherwise you wouldn’t be trying to insult me by saying I can’t think for myself, or whatever weird stuff you wrote above.
“And how do we know who’s is the truth. Not which authority tells me “how” to interpret things but whatever is of sound mind. Does that make sense. Thanks”
Yeah it makes sense inasmuch as I know what you’re trying to say, but it is stupid. You wrote somewhere that you’re not advocating for moral relativism, but your contention here is the textbook definition of moral relativism.