To somejewiknow
I thank you for your rapid response to my question. That’s menschlich something that Shmei and certain others know nothing about. This said your answer was disingenuous. I’ll accept the first part but not the second and I’ll explain. Let’s examine the first part. Yes Zionism was a secular anti-Torah movement. Well, it logically follows that those who are not secular nor anti-Torah are not Zionists. This excludes all the people you are railing against including yours truly. You then throw in that Zionism today means anyone who wants the State of Israel to exist. That’s not a definition. It’s your biased opinion. I’ll offer a Moshol. Rabbi Miller said that anyone with a TV in his house has no Cheilek in Olam Habo. He then “proves” it. The Mishna in Cheilek says that those who study Seforim Chitzonim have no Cheilek in Olam Habo and Rabbi Miller defines Seforim Chitzonim as TV. So he gave a definition to fit his opinion. That’s called self serving Torah and it’s garbage and that’s exactly what you’re presenting. According to the second half of your definition one must wish for the destruction of the State of Israel
So it follows that you Daven that the Iranian bombs kill as many “sonei Yisrael” as possible. Am I right?