This entire premise is wrong. Chassidim trust the Rebbe simply because that’s how a devoted talmid relates to ??? ??????.
Chassidim follow their rebbe with ????? ?????, they feel that ?? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ??????, and they apply to their rebbe ?? ???? ???? ?????.
———————————
1] How could the Baal HaTurim argue with his rabo muvhak, his own father , the leader of the entire generation , the ROSH ?
Numerous times ?
2] They ‘feel” that kol hame’harher ….. . Question was not about feelings. Feelings is not knowledge. How do they know – was the question.
3] Kol hameharher achar rabo ,,,, does not mean that every talmid is obligated to believe that his rabo muvhak is INFALLIBLE .
However that’s what Menachem is saying, in other words.
4] rabo muvhak is someone who is rov toratoh mimenu. I know many habad hasidim who the majority of their torah knowledge does not come from their rebbi.
%] Lo tasur is said about the bet din hagadol which was s
5] Using Menachems logic then , all talmidim of many litvish [and satmar to a certain degree] should blindly accept that the rebbi from habad was an apikores, a mashiach sheker , a tsioni and a megis libo behora’a ? Otherwise, they are included in kol hamehaher ?