It is a deeply disturbing fault of one’s character to attack someone continously because they dared to say pshat on a Rashi thats different than what their rebbe in cheder taught them
Philosopher, You are completely shameless.
Let’s all remember the FIRST POST that began the conversation about ???? ?? ??, a post by Philosopher:
“It is Lubavitche like you who twist everything out of context. For example when Rashi says that Yaacov avinu did not die there are numerous mefarshim that explain what it means. There is no mefoiresh saying that he is here with us physically. And yet i heard a Chabad rabbi claim that Rashi said that Yaacov is with us physically; that is a lie.”
There you have it. Philosopher began this conversation by viciously attacking all those who understand Rashi the simple way it is learned in the yeshivos.
The next post from Philosopher was: “But you have to be “not too smart” to even think that Rashi thought that Yaacov Avinu is still PHYSICALLY alive during his time…”
Thus it continued, with Philosopher mocking and deriding anyone who learned the commonly accepted pshat of Rashi and some other meforshim.
When those opposing her view began answering back in the same manner as her, she begins crying how mean it is to attack someone for a having different pshat in Rashi.
Who began this attack!? Shame on you!
I must agree with Arso about the pot and kettle.